To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

RANT: drivers

edited October 2008 in General
im sure everyone has seen some shity driving on the road so why not vent it?

university drive around 11am today
black acura tl plate 191GPW
crosses double yellow line to pass a car going already 110km/h with on coming traffic....
now how much in a rush can you be to do somehting that stupid? is ur life meaning less? late for exam ? wtf?
«13

Comments

  • edited October 2008
    Driving makes you do crazy things. What's the deal with calling out the license plate?
  • edited October 2008
    hey my exam was worth 50%. Cut me some slack
  • edited October 2008
    is you're mazda 3 stock? also whats the legality behind recording people?
  • edited October 2008
    I could rant about computer drivers instead. :D
  • edited October 2008
    mrbubbles;39027 said:
    Driving makes you do crazy things. What's the deal with calling out the license plate?
    lets see... risking his/her own life, risking the life of the person in the suv that was oncoming, risking the life of the people in the car he/she passed
    so if i call out the lic plate u bet ur ass its worth it not to mention anyone could get a lic plate...

    as for recording lic plates. it dosnt matter if its legal or not im allowed to record w/e i want in public @ no point did i upload it ;)this could apply to anyone recording anything :S
    and the lic above was called out cuz its probably an sfu student and im calling him/her out for doing something very fucking stupid... the moral was "what were u in such a rush for that u needed to perform that stunt"
  • edited October 2008
    i_like_hiking;39030 said:
    is you're mazda 3 stock? also whats the legality behind recording people?
    oh as for legality keep in mind news stations pay people money for home clips of events :P so actually having a cam on u @ all time is encouraged in our society haha
  • edited October 2008
    I actually thought this thread was about computer drivers.

    God, I'm such a nerd.
  • edited October 2008
    bufli;39036 said:
    oh as for legality keep in mind news stations pay people money for home clips of events :P so actually having a cam on u @ all time is encouraged in our society haha
    u never feel the need for speed? always drive the speed limit? come to complete stops at every intersection?
  • edited October 2008
    bufli;39026 said:
    im sure everyone has seen some shity driving on the road so why not vent it?
    ive started a lil project on recording these people at their worst...
    Let me get this straight. You drive around with a camera in your car to film people's bad driving and then post their license plate number and clips on the internet..

    What's more dangerous: their bad driving, or you fumbling with the video recorder while you try and catch them committing some minor traffic misdemeanor?

    Get off your high horse and just drive your car.
  • edited October 2008
    You guys do realize its a 60 zone (it is 60 right, haha, i haven't driven to school in a year). If he sped by a car going 110, he was probably going 120 or higher, which is considered dangerous driving, which is an offence in the Criminal code... theres the need for speed, then there's being retarded
  • edited October 2008
    Fuck, today around 11 I was driving on university drive and some douche in a mazda 3 was go SO SLOW!!

    I had to pass him because I could not stand how slow he was going. What a douche, he made me cross a double solid yellow line into on coming traffic.
  • edited October 2008
    LOL
  • edited October 2008
    JayDub;39056 said:
    Fuck, today around 11 I was driving on university drive and some douche in a mazda 3 was go SO SLOW!!

    I had to pass him because I could not stand how slow he was going. What a douche, he made me cross a double solid yellow line into on coming traffic.
    seriously, its jokes now if someone woulda gotten hurt ud be dissing the guy, its unreal how stupid and useless ur comments are
    and since ur being a smart ass go ask ur daddy how many people die from speeding (since u mentioned hes a cop) better yet ask him about the girl in coquitlam who got run over by the son of a policeman doing an estimated 100km/h in a 30zone killed the girl and didnt even get shit cuz his daddy was a cop
    so plz stfu
    Triple;39055 said:
    You guys do realize its a 60 zone (it is 60 right, haha, i haven't driven to school in a year). If he sped by a car going 110, he was probably going 120 or higher, which is considered dangerous driving, which is an offence in the Criminal code... theres the need for speed, then there's being retarded
    its a 70 zone, and for the record i wasn't driving and i wasn't even in my car lol...
    i_like_hiking;39052 said:
    u never feel the need for speed? always drive the speed limit? come to complete stops at every intersection?
    funny cuz my friends nicknamed me grandpa for driving the limit most of the time ;) as for complete stops, yup do those
    Ether;39053 said:
    Let me get this straight. You drive around with a camera in your car to film people's bad driving and then post their license plate number and clips on the internet..

    What's more dangerous: their bad driving, or you fumbling with the video recorder while you try and catch them committing some minor traffic misdemeanor?

    Get off your high horse and just drive your car.
    not even close
    i record my drive for my own well being if anyones ever dealt with ICBC knows how bullshit their system is and they will point 50/50 fault in no time so they don't pay shit, if someone hits me ill have proof beyond doubt ;)
    if u want an example of this this happened 3years ago, driving through GREEN light get t-boned by some guy not payn attention icbc appoints fault @ 50/50. so apart from the car being a writeoff u get the the whole issue of almost having died and its 50/50? oh and there was a witness which icbc seemed to have ignored that they also confitmed the car running the red..
    so in other words there is no better proof then a picture and better then that is a video

    as for dangerous u made a very stupid assumption because the cam is mounted i press rec b4 i leave and stop when i reach my parking spot ;)
  • edited October 2008
    and i like how everyone is attacking me for sayn i record my drive... whats so wrong about that :S esp when u consider the kidna shit thats on youtube / facebook lmao whats worse is some of u are defending or glorifying the guy in the TL tho if you would have been there yourselves u would of said the exact same thing as me its kind of pathetic esp of university students really interesting tho to see the things u guys read form the original post, i was merely asking what one could be in such a rush for to do those things and u guys went off into a different direction nitpicking
  • edited October 2008
    bufli;39061 said:

    so plz stfu
    plz lrn2grammar.
  • edited October 2008
    i dont recall attacking you in any sort of way merely posing a few quesitons.
  • edited October 2008
    also, how does our society promote video voyeurism in any sense? it seems that your statement is more directed towards the media stations out there who are the ones paying money not society as a whole.
  • edited October 2008
    There's a recording device that some people add on to their cars just in case an accident happens. It's good for providing evidence if something happens and the other party has a different story.
  • edited October 2008
    i_like_hiking;39067 said:
    also, how does our society promote video voyeurism in any sense? it seems that your statement is more directed towards the media stations out there who are the ones paying money not society as a whole.
    yes its the media who are asking for the content from the public (since they cant be everywhere)
    but if society wouldn't want to see it why would they record it, and pass it on to essentially a mass content distributor?
    i_like_hiking;39066 said:
    i dont recall attacking you in any sort of way merely posing a few quesitons.
    fair enough my bad in being too general in my claim "everyone" :P
  • edited October 2008
    Recording license plates is actually legal believe it or not. Someone started a site dedicated to this years ago, and some government lawyer said it was part of public domain or something.

    SFU probably has the worst drivers. Go to a parking lot and look at some of the cars there, BMWs, modified cars with fart cans on them, Mercedes, Porches, all kinds. Add a long, wide road, a sport car and some adrenaline and you get this. Hopefully someone falls of the mountain one day and dies in a horrible, fire-y death. Saw a Porsche driver try and squeeze between traffic and the bus and ended up chipping his mirror.
  • edited October 2008
    i understand the basis of a recording system which will act as an "electronic witness" to the accident however i still disagree with your earlier statement that society promotes having a camera on you at all times because there will be some sort of payout. while the justification you provide for having a camera in vehicle (ie. having been in a previous crash you just want to have yourself covered) is totally understandable.

    posting of the persons specific vehicle and licence plate number seems to violate a certain sense of privacy which i should hope, that you would expect others to extend to you as well. should someone wish to post your vehicle make and licence plate on a public forum you've provided the "ok" since you've done it yourself (that is, posted someone elses info without their permission). posting other peoples info and not having your own posted seems a bit hypocritical.
  • edited October 2008
    bufli;39062 said:
    and i like how everyone is attacking me for sayn i record my drive... whats so wrong about that :S esp when u consider the kidna shit thats on youtube / facebook lmao whats worse is some of u are defending or glorifying the guy in the TL tho if you would have been there yourselves u would of said the exact same thing as me its kind of pathetic esp of university students really interesting tho to see the things u guys read form the original post, i was merely asking what one could be in such a rush for to do those things and u guys went off into a different direction nitpicking
    wrong.. i probably would've laughed if he got into an accident after witnessing how he did it in the first place.. :angel: :embarassed: :tongue:

    no one is defending him.. if you've read the comments carefully you'll see what they're getting at.. but are you shitting me about the recording business? o.O"
  • edited October 2008
    Agentbob;39072 said:
    Recording license plates is actually legal believe it or not. Someone started a site dedicated to this years ago, and some government lawyer said it was part of public domain or something.

    SFU probably has the worst drivers. Go to a parking lot and look at some of the cars there, BMWs, modified cars with fart cans on them, Mercedes, Porches, all kinds. Add a long, wide road, a sport car and some adrenaline and you get this. Hopefully someone falls of the mountain one day and dies in a horrible, fire-y death. Saw a Porsche driver try and squeeze between traffic and the bus and ended up chipping his mirror.
    thats already happened lots of times, people role into the ditch at the bottom curve just before the broadway intersection with gaglardi.
  • edited October 2008
    btw while the speed limit on gaglardi may be 70 the actual speed limit for the uphill stretch of sfu is 60 which eventually whittles down to 30 at the last corners.
  • edited October 2008
    i_like_hiking;39073 said:
    i understand the basis of a recording system which will act as an "electronic witness" to the accident however i still disagree with your earlier statement that society promotes having a camera on you at all times because there will be some sort of payout. while the justification you provide for having a camera in vehicle (ie. having been in a previous crash you just want to have yourself covered) is totally understandable.

    posting of the persons specific vehicle and licence plate number seems to violate a certain sense of privacy which i should hope, that you would expect others to extend to you as well. should someone wish to post your vehicle make and licence plate on a public forum you've provided the "ok" since you've done it yourself (that is, posted someone elses info without their permission). posting other peoples info and not having your own posted seems a bit hypocritical.
    that is fair but i did not point out who was driving
    i did not give a physical description of the driver thus u cannot relate a license plate to a face or name thus the person remains anonymous to quite a wide extent i mean how many people will run plate lookup to find out who the owner is because of the above comment?

    as for would i expect the same? YES! if i were to drive like the driver in question thinking its "cool" id love to be called out by the public to show that its not sharing the same opinion as me, heck it would sure beat a ticket and better yet beat continuing this kind of behavior until god forbid an accident occurred
  • edited October 2008
    JayDub;39056 said:
    mazda 3 was go SO SLOW!!
    plz lrn2grammar...
  • edited October 2008
    i remember coming down the mountain on 145 and seeing some guy hit the barrier with his hummer lol.....funniest part was that it was smoking and he was on the phone crying....hopefully no one died :|

    and I agree about the recording thing..it can be a useful thing..if you ever get into an accident, and you have no witnesses its gunna be a 50/50 split.....which means icbc gets the $$$$$....

    and 120 km/hr is just plain stupid...i mean you can do it on the highway no problem (even more than 120), but on a hill with minimal visibility? buses at all hours? ...stupid
  • edited October 2008
    bufli;39079 said:
    that is fair but i did not point out who was driving
    i did not give a physical description of the driver thus u cannot relate a license plate to a face or name thus the person remains anonymous to quite a wide extent i mean how many people will run plate lookup to find out who the owner is because of the above comment?

    as for would i expect the same? YES! if i were to drive like the driver in question thinking its "cool" id love to be called out by the public to show that its not sharing the same opinion as me, heck it would sure beat a ticket and better yet beat continuing this kind of behavior until god forbid an accident occurred
    i agree that you did not provide a physical description of the person and see that as a fair statement however it is not always necessary to do a plate lookup to find the owner of a vehicle. as sfu is a fairly small community it would be possible, should a person be motivated to do so, to find out the owner of the vehicle based on the information that was provided.

    also i give some respect to the fact that you would expect the same.

    however, if video surveilance is to become the norm and the slow encroachment of cctv cameras every 30 feet is to occur because society is desensitized to the nature of being video recorded then,

    what is suggested by the type of behaviour you practice (i.e. recording bad drivers) is that rather then individual citizens of "goodwill" go around recording the bad guys speeding around with their dashboard mounted cameras, there should be a system in place to catch people via the government. as your actions do not provide any resolve to the issue whereas the government or law enforcement could apprehend and punish said offenders...?
  • edited October 2008
    siuying;39074 said:
    but are you shitting me about the recording business? o.O"
    i stated why i do it, if the people working for ICBC wouldn't be such assholes about their job a witness and a statement would be enough proof.. but to them its about money and if they make a case 50/50 both parties pay their own damage and they both have their rates increased...
    if hitting a rec button before i set off the drive means i can avoid dealing (arguing) with ICBC then yes its worth it
    i hope u haven't had bad experiences with ICBC and i hope no1 will :)
  • edited October 2008
    lazyGUY;39082 said:
    i remember coming down the mountain on 145 and seeing some guy hit the barrier with his hummer lol.....funniest part was that it was smoking and he was on the phone crying....hopefully no one died :|

    and I agree about the recording thing..it can be a useful thing..if you ever get into an accident, and you have no witnesses its gunna be a 50/50 split.....which means icbc gets the $$$$$....

    and 120 km/hr is just plain stupid...i mean you can do it on the highway no problem (even more than 120), but on a hill with minimal visibility? buses at all hours? ...stupid
    so speeding on the highway vs speeding on the mountain is different in that one is excusable? how is it different that on the highway its ok and the mountain its not.? wouldnt it be best that no one speed at all, since it is still possible for people to create accidents on the highway as it is possible to create them on the mountain?

    going 120 uphill on sfu would probably give you more of a chance to brake in a shorter distance rather then attempting to do the same on the highway as there is more resistance on the car travelling uphil because of gravity.

Leave a Comment