To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

Conditions for Sex.

edited June 2010 in General
Thought this was an interesting conversational question. What're each of your own personal rules? Do you have sex on the first date? Do you have one night stands? Do you wait until you love a person?

Keep in mind that there is no right or wrong answer, for those of you that like to sit on high horses.

Personally I'd never thought much about it. Being in a long term relationship kind of takes the "what ifs" out of the equation. I never got to date much and so I never got to know who I am and where I stand when it comes to sex as a single. I know where I stand on the issue in a relationship.

Anyhow, I've been single and dating for a few months now--and it's been a few very exciting months. For example--for me, sex is more exciting when it's with someone you're just seeing rather than your boyfriend. Being in a relationship, you take sex (or any other form of physical affection) for granted because you know it's a sure thing. You know who you're going home with at the end of the night and you know for a fact that you'll be able to get laid that night if you wished it. You know all this with absolute certainty because your significant other wants you just as much as you want them.

But merely dating someone, you actually don't know whether they find you as attractive as they say they do. You don't know if he/she is picturing you naked. You don't know how experienced they are. You don't know if they're the horny type of the brainy type.

Hence excitement.

For me there is a lot of this excitement going on, as I'm dating four different people. No, I'm not sleeping with all of them. I find that the sex rules apply to them differently, depends on how much I care about their perception of me.

Anyhow, enough chit chat from me. I promise I will divulge more hilarious dating stories as I go (there is one about me mistaking who I was even dating).

Contribute away!
«13

Comments

  • edited November 2009
    ummm....so ur sayn as a girl, getting laid is not a sure thing? (something seems wrong here)
  • edited November 2009
    Well, yah. Because a chick's end goal for a date usually ISN'T getting laid. And even though a guy's end goal typically IS, they are so scared by the social norm nowadays that they don't make an advances until a much later time.

    But I'm generalising here, of course.
  • edited November 2009
    What happened to the state-side BF?
  • edited November 2009
    Lixie;61454 said:
    ...even though a guy's end goal typically IS [getting laid]
    Lixie;61454 said:

    But merely dating someone, you actually don't know whether they find you as attractive as they say they do. You don't know if he/she is picturing you naked. You don't know how experienced they are. You don't know if they're the horny type of the brainy type.

    Hence excitement.
    [sarcasm]
    well given the generalization made, which i think is a fair one, we can conclude that if a guy is on a date with you:
    they probably find you attractive enough to be seen around with you
    they probably are picturing you naked, or imagining what their gonna do to u once they get u naked
    and that their horny 24/7
    lol [/sarcasm]

    and as u said i also believe the sex rules applies differently depending on the person
  • edited November 2009
    I've been seeing a couple people for the past month and I followed the third date rule. One guy turned out to be a douche and the other one... well, we're kind of an item now. :)
  • edited November 2009
    I've always been really guarded with sex.

    I don't really have set rules for myself. I was with someone for almost a year and it was almost entirely physical...which was crazy exciting. Hotels, flying away to another city for the weekend...tons of fun.

    With that being said, I'm with someone right now and have been for almost a year and a half. We're waiting for marriage. He knows I've had sex, but he never has (weird dynamic for a few weeks after having that talk as he's quite a bit older). Even though this is completely opposite from what I'm used to, it's exciting as well because of what we're looking forward to.

    HOWEVER, it's really fucking hard as I'm a super sexual person.
  • edited November 2009
    hmm... i don't have any particular rules i follow.. if it happens then it happens.. i like to think that it's a different case for each as opposed to following rules step by step..

    now that i think about it.. how come there's no none of the above option? :angry:

    :tongue:
  • edited November 2009
    who here thinks siuying is a virgo

    *raises hands*
  • edited November 2009
    online predator;61463 said:
    who here thinks siuying is a virgo

    *raises hands*
    Don't be silly, vampires can't have sex. It's a known fact.
  • edited November 2009
    So 2 people and counting...
  • edited November 2009
    At this moment in time, I'd say I would only have sex in the context of a relationship. But I wouldn't put any set time-line on what point in that relationship it happens. It happens when it happens.

    This hasn't always been my rule..but I've gotten over my slightly promiscuous phase...haha.
  • edited November 2009
    @predator: hahaha no.. i'm a taurus..:angel: so put yo hands down..=)

    @agentbob: you have got to be kidding.. vampires have the best kind of sex..=P

    and see! exactly what anonymous said.. it happens when it happens
  • edited November 2009
    @nicole - props cuz thats just f***n crazy lol

    @siuying - do elaborate on how vampire sex is better
  • edited November 2009
    nicole;61461 said:
    I've always been really guarded with sex.

    I don't really have set rules for myself. I was with someone for almost a year and it was almost entirely physical...which was crazy exciting. Hotels, flying away to another city for the weekend...tons of fun.

    With that being said, I'm with someone right now and have been for almost a year and a half. We're waiting for marriage. He knows I've had sex, but he never has (weird dynamic for a few weeks after having that talk as he's quite a bit older). Even though this is completely opposite from what I'm used to, it's exciting as well because of what we're looking forward to.

    HOWEVER, it's really fucking hard as I'm a super sexual person.
    damn...why not let me connect my pipe in your backyard...I gonna feed you there...

    lol joking
  • edited November 2009
    nicole;61461 said:
    I've always been really guarded with sex.

    I don't really have set rules for myself. I was with someone for almost a year and it was almost entirely physical...which was crazy exciting. Hotels, flying away to another city for the weekend...tons of fun.

    With that being said, I'm with someone right now and have been for almost a year and a half. We're waiting for marriage. He knows I've had sex, but he never has (weird dynamic for a few weeks after having that talk as he's quite a bit older). Even though this is completely opposite from what I'm used to, it's exciting as well because of what we're looking forward to.

    HOWEVER, it's really fucking hard as I'm a super sexual person.
    Hmm, have you tried convincing him? I'm not even considering getting married or have anyone in mind, but I think sex is mandatory before getting married to someone. Any relationship has a physical aspect that needs to be addressed before you tie the knot. I think doing things like this are why divorce rates are so high nowadays. I'm an atheist so the whole religion aspect is a moot point for me.

    Also, I don't want to get to personal, and don't feel obliged to answer, but have you guys done anything at all?
  • edited November 2009
    It's a morality thing for him, so I just accept it for what it is and would never try to 'convince' him otherwise. He's dated a lot of people but says he's never found that 'one', and since he's waited this long already...that's his reasoning at least.

    When it comes to marriage, I do want to get married. If I had my way, I'd be engaged by this Christmas and married by next year. I used to thing sex was pretty important before marriage, but honestly, I know my boyfriend more than I have ever known anyone I think. It's amazing how different a relationship is when you place emphasis on actually knowing eachother.

    To answer your last question, yes, we've done most everything.
  • edited November 2009
    siuying;61468 said:
    and see! exactly what anonymous said.. it happens when it happens
    For me, too. It depends on how much I like/respect the person.

    And there is no "none of the above" option so I can torture people, HAR HAR!!

    Also, to answer Online Pred: the American boyfriend is biting the dust. We both decided that the long distance thing was much too difficult--and we both needed to be in a better place mentally for the relationship to work at all. There was a lot of maturing to do. I've been with him since I was 19--I matured into an adult while being with him, and I wanted to grow individually.
  • edited November 2009
    BREAKING NEWS

    Randomuser is in relationship :)
  • edited November 2009
    @bufli: because you can bleed a vampire in ways you can't do with a human.. ;)

    @lixie: oh evil evil you.. me likey.. =P

    @hope: breaking news? i was was always under the impression she was never single.. at least not for long.. :tongue:
  • edited November 2009
    siuying;61481 said:
    @bufli: because you can bleed a vampire in ways you can't do with a human.. ;)
    w-t-f
    now I'm left wondering whats more disturbing that comment or this kid:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1IuVs6JSpI#t=20s

    jkjk
  • edited November 2009
    nicole;61472 said:

    When it comes to marriage, I do want to get married. If I had my way, I'd be engaged by this Christmas and married by next year.
    Speaking of marriage, do women expect to get married within 1-2 years of dating? Is there some sort of threshold that the guy would cross before you break it off from commitment issues? 1-2 years seems incredibly hasty. I always had my mark set at around 6-7 years. No wonder my previous relationship suck so much.
  • edited November 2009
    Agentbob;61486 said:
    Speaking of marriage, do women expect to get married within 1-2 years of dating? Is there some sort of threshold that the guy would cross before you break it off from commitment issues? 1-2 years seems incredibly hasty. I always had my mark set at around 6-7 years. No wonder my previous relationship suck so much.
    id go with the 5+ years before marriage, just to make sure ur completely bored of the person yet u can still stand them :teeth:
  • edited November 2009
    Agentbob;61486 said:
    Speaking of marriage, do women expect to get married within 1-2 years of dating? Is there some sort of threshold that the guy would cross before you break it off from commitment issues? 1-2 years seems incredibly hasty. I always had my mark set at around 6-7 years. No wonder my previous relationship suck so much.
    In my opinion, if you don't know by 1.5 to 2 years that the person you're with is someone you'd want spend the rest of your life with, then maybe that's a read flag right there. I don't expect to get married within 1-2 years, but by 2 I would hope for an engagement.

    That's just me.
  • edited November 2009
    I think long-term engagements are stupid. An engagement should signify that you're getting married within a year or so, in my opinion. That's the point of an engagement...to know you're getting married soon. Not that you're getting married, eventually. If someone gets engaged, you generally ask when the wedding is going to be. If someone were to say in 2015, I'd ask what's the point of being engaged? Makes no difference other than boyfriend/girlfriend...just a different title.

    I think it's perfectly reasonable to discuss marriage, and know you want to marry each other, but not get engaged until the event is actually going to happen. Why have a fiance for 5+ years? It just seems like a pretentious title when it's for that long.

    Even if I were to find "the one" right now. I wouldn't want to marry them for another 5-7 years from now, when my life is more settled.

    ...anyways. That's just my opinion on engagements.
  • edited November 2009
    anonymous1;61492 said:
    I think long-term engagements are stupid. An engagement should signify that you're getting married within a year or so, in my opinion. That's the point of an engagement...to know you're getting married soon. Not that you're getting married, eventually. If someone gets engaged, you generally ask when the wedding is going to be. If someone were to say in 2015, I'd ask what's the point of being engaged? Makes no difference other than boyfriend/girlfriend...just a different title.

    I think it's perfectly reasonable to discuss marriage, and know you want to marry each other, but not get engaged until the event is actually going to happen. Why have a fiance for 5+ years? It just seems like a pretentious title when it's for that long.

    Even if I were to find "the one" right now. I wouldn't want to marry them for another 5-7 years from now, when my life is more settled.

    ...anyways. That's just my opinion on engagements.
    Who said anything about a long engagement?
  • edited November 2009
    I guess no one did directly. Bit of a tangent, sorry. I just interpreted your wanting to be engaged in 2 years as you wanting to be engaged after dating someone for two years, instead of in two years time, forgetting about the fact that you've already been dating someone for a year and a half.

    So my misinterpretation lead to me thinking there wasn't a point to being engaged by a certain amount of time unless it actually meant I was going to get married soon after the engagement. The idea of thinking I want to be engaged in X years for me would mean I want to be married by X+1 years...haha.

    Anyways. Sex. I've never waited until I was "in love".
  • edited November 2009
    Agentbob;61486 said:
    Speaking of marriage, do women expect to get married within 1-2 years of dating? Is there some sort of threshold that the guy would cross before you break it off from commitment issues? 1-2 years seems incredibly hasty. I always had my mark set at around 6-7 years. No wonder my previous relationship suck so much.
    Same with me. Definitely around 6 years.
  • edited November 2009
    anonymous1;61494 said:
    Anyways. Sex. I've never waited until I was "in love".
    Hip Hip HORRAH.

    Anyway, I promised you guys exciting dating stories.

    I've dated five people so far, since July. I know, I work fast.

    First guy was this fat Italian, we'll call him B. He was chubby, and he played ice hockey. First time sex? In his SUV. It was steamy, but only because I was sex deprived for a while. In hindsight, I don't know what I was thinking. We were friends/dating for a while though before we got around to the sex--and it was pretty much because I was tipsy and lonely (the perfect combination!)

    Second guy is a tall, handsome, white guy. He actually looked like a Prince Charming. He's G. Sex happened after the standard third date. He was kind. Though his end game WAS sex. I knew this only afterward, which peeved me to no end. Needless to say, I broke it off with him. The sex was GREAT though.

    Third, A.J. I didn't even know this guy's name until after our first date. I didn't eve know I WAS going on a date with him until our first date. Funny story. He had been texting me on and off after meeting me at Peter's birthday club outting. He asked me out, and that entire time I thought he was someone else I had given my number to. So imagine my face when he shows up outside my house to pick me up.... yes, jaw open, eyes wide. But what do I do? I went on that fucking date anyway. And it was one of the best. A.J. is nice, and loaded. But not super attractive. We haven't slept together.

    Fourth, J. He was a T.A. at SFU for Chem. The week we met was his last week at school as he found a "real job" or so he calls it. I'm head over heels in love with this guy for no good reason (for his brains, really). We haven't slept together or done much of that funky stuff as we both really like each other and enjoy the company.

    Fifth, R. Not so much a date as an acquaintance fuck. We got down to business the second time we met. Physical attraction is all there. He's also loaded--great condo with a fantastic view, he owns a company, young, etc. etc. Though the arrogance comes along with all that. He expects me to come over every other day and sleep over every other night. Pretty much expects me to be available 24-7 for his penis needs.

    Anyhow, all of this is what brought up my interest in how people go about this sex thing. I find that for me, sex really depends on the individual people I happen to meet. Coming out of a long term relationship, I'm not looking to get into another one--though I like this T.A just enough to go steady if he asked.

    But jesus, I never thought dating would be this much fun...
  • edited November 2009
    Agentbob;61486 said:
    Speaking of marriage, do women expect to get married within 1-2 years of dating? Is there some sort of threshold that the guy would cross before you break it off from commitment issues? 1-2 years seems incredibly hasty. I always had my mark set at around 6-7 years. No wonder my previous relationship suck so much.
    if things go according to my preferences.. i wouldn't want to get married.. ever.
    that said.. i agree with nicole that you should know a person by 1.5-2 years.. maybe not inside out but atleast you should have a good grasp of that person's nature and character before deciding if it's a keepsake relationship..

    but wow lixie..you've been a busy busy girl..=P
  • IVTIVT
    edited November 2009
    siuying;61498 said:
    if things go according to my preferences.. i wouldn't want to get married.. ever.
    that said.. i agree with nicole that you should know a person by 1.5-2 years.. maybe not inside out but atleast you should have a good grasp of that person's nature and character before deciding if it's a keepsake relationship..

    but wow lixie..you've been a busy busy girl..=P
    imo you need to know all of his/her flaws before getting married. The day you decide to get married should be the day you decide that you're ok with all their flaws

Leave a Comment