To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

How old were you when you lost your virginity?

24567

Comments

  • edited June 2008
    Morro;30997 said:
    It's simply the way humans are. I hear stories about hot 30 year old teachers "victimizing" their poor 15 year old male student by having sex with them, and I laugh. He's not a victim. But a 15 year old girl who has sex with a 30 year old man is being taken advantage of, and I don't care whether she agrees with that assessment, or not. There are just different standards for men and women.

    At 18, it's borderline. It think it's less creepy than it is pathetic. A ~30 year old who needs to go after 17 year olds is seriously lacking in the play department. No offense intended, of course. :)
    It took a good few months for this particular person to be comfortable with it, and even then I don't think he really was (partially why we broke up).
    In his defense, I lied about my age when we met. Yikes.
    But he was definitely not someone 'lacking in the play department'. If anything, it scared me at how suave he was!
  • edited June 2008
    who would have thought... an internet forum with some virgins... *gasp*
  • edited June 2008
    Triple;31014 said:
    who would have thought... an internet forum with some virgins... *gasp*
    What other internet forums have YOU been hanging out in?
  • edited June 2008
    Student0667;31018 said:
    What other internet forums have YOU been hanging out in?
    The "Pregnancy Forum". :tongue:
  • edited June 2008
    randomuser;30990 said:


    PS: there are a surprising amount of virgins here, more people than i thought anyway, which makes me wonder about the general population
    What if there are a lot of kids on this forum...
  • edited June 2008
    trust me you guys will be complaining when youre 30 and some 18 year old, blonde, double d chick calls you old when you hit on her in a bar

    noone cares when a 28 year old sleeps with a 40 year old, is there any other reasons besides emotional maturity that come into play here?

    guys sleeping with girls 16 and under, well thats just disgusting its basically sleeping with children

    there should not be different standards between guys and girls when it comes to sex, and if there is what is the reason why? is it cause the girl has to open her legs and all the guy has to do is stick it in? if you can think of one reason that doesnt relate to patriarchy and religious standards held on women im all ears

    i think there should be an age cut off

    anyone over 18 can sleep with whoever they want, whatever age they want, i think if a girl is 18 and has such low self esteem she needs to sleep with some ugly 45 year old guy, well shes pretty much in trouble for the rest of her life if her self esteem is 0 at that age

    ive never slept with anyone over 35, but theres guys in their late twenties and early thirties who are smoking hot and got their shit together, its nice when i dont always have to hang out at my place cause a guy has his own place
  • edited June 2008
    noone cares when a 28 year old sleeps with a 40 year old, is there any other reasons besides emotional maturity that come into play here?
    They don't care because they're not even remotely analagous situations. That's why they don't care. A 28 year old is a 28 year old. You might as well argue that nobody thinks it's wrong for a 40 year old to sleep with a 60 year old. It's technically true, but what's your point?
    there should not be different standards between guys and girls when it comes to sex
    Indeed. We should allow our fundamentalist bias towards gender indenticality (not equality) to force us to bury our heads in the sand and ignore the very real, very obvious psychological and physiological differences between males and females. Feminism took a turn for the worse once all the important battles were won. Now it fights retarded battles to try to stop people from acknowledging bits of reality they find uncomfortable.
  • edited June 2008
    You are all forgetting the half your age + 7 rule.

    So if you are 40 (40/2 + 7 = 27), sleeping with someone 28 is fine.

    If you are 60 (60/2 + 7 = 37), sleeping with someone 40 is fine.

    If you are 30 (30/2 + 7 = 22) sleeping with an 18 year old = not cool.

    If you are 27 (27/2 + 7 = 20.5) sleeping with a 17 year old = still not cool.
  • edited June 2008
    I know what you're getting at but didnt say the first time

    That woman are more emotionally unstable than men when it comes to relationships and sex

    Thats only true under a majority of the circumstances

    The point society makes is that women are weaker mentally when it comes to bonding experiences, and its just not true all the time, which is what I don't like
    ------I'm not even feminist, i just dont like assumptions that are usually justified passed on me


    It fails to appreciate the fact some women use men for sex, I have plenty of friends who have slept with guys cause they were horny, and the guy was the one who kept calling them back and being needy

    I've also had more than one guy in tears over me, who I probably took advantage of physically or emotionally

    Why cant the woman be the predator, why do guys get all the fun?
  • edited June 2008
    .
    JayDub;31060 said:
    You are all forgetting the half your age + 7 rule.

    So if you are 40 (40/2 + 7 = 27), sleeping with someone 28 is fine.

    If you are 60 (60/2 + 7 = 37), sleeping with someone 40 is fine.

    If you are 30 (30/2 + 7 = 22) sleeping with an 18 year old = not cool.

    If you are 27 (27/2 + 7 = 20.5) sleeping with a 17 year old = still not cool.
  • edited June 2008
    well my buddy who is 19 is dating a lady who is 31......eeeeeks
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2008
    randomuser;31052 said:
    double d chick
    eeewww
    randomuser;31062 said:

    Why cant the woman be the predator, why do guys get all the fun?
    Winking-Cougar-Print-C10054490.jpeg

    you can when you're 40+
  • edited June 2008
    id rather prey on men while im ahead in the game, once youre 40 youll have to worry about younger guys leaving you cause you aint got enough honey
  • edited June 2008
    IVT;31069 said:
    eeewww
    OK i dont get it
    How can u be straight and say ewwwww to double d's
  • edited June 2008
    maybe the double Ds hes thinkin of are all veiny and disgusting looking, lol
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2008
    i'd take a girl with a pretty face and A cups over double ds. Big boobed girls are usually fat
  • edited June 2008
    IVT;31080 said:
    i'd take a girl with a pretty face and A cups over double ds. Big boobed girls are usually fat
    Aren't you the one who has never been on a date? Why should you even have a preference that specific?
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2008
    nicole;31081 said:
    Aren't you the one who has never been on a date? Why should you even have a preference that specific?
    because i'm not desperate and i have standards?
  • edited June 2008
    What a shitty standard too have.
    I can imagine you saying " I cant date that girl, her boobs are too big and sexy for me" lol
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2008
    proportion is sexy, size is not
  • edited June 2008
    IVT;31080 said:
    i'd take a girl with a pretty face and A cups over double ds. Big boobed girls are usually fat
    I think he's being converted by randomuser's display pic... j/k :tongue:

    Don't be so superficial, it's best to find someone who's nice.
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2008
    randomuser;31057 said:
    i have a you have to be this tall to ride this ride rule for guys i date
    IVT;31080 said:
    i'd take a girl with a pretty face and A cups over double ds. Big boobed girls are usually fat
    is randomuser superficial too? Or is it just wrong for me to have high standards?
  • edited June 2008
    for once i have to concur i probably am highly superficial

    but for me it doesn't prevent me from dating, but i'm thinking it's easier for girls to find guys than vice versa
  • edited June 2008
    IVT;31091 said:
    proportion is sexy, size is not
    It is possible to have larger breasts and not be an ogre, you know.
  • edited June 2008
    lazyGUY;31089 said:
    What a shitty standard too have.
    I can imagine you saying " I cant date that girl, her boobs are too big and sexy for me" lol
    IMFAO. Don't be a TNA hater.

    Here's a question for the guys: Are you more attracted to the slimmer girls or the curvier ones? (When I say curvy I don't mean overweight.)
  • edited June 2008
    ugh skinny chicks are gross
    flat chest, flat ass, whats the point? might as well date a dude
  • edited June 2008
    lazyguy said:
    OK i dont get it
    How can u be straight and say ewwwww to double d's
    Personal preference. Just to set the record straight, you guys are refering to the Brassiere measurements when you talk about all these double D, A cup, and stuff, right?
    IVT said:
    i'd take a girl with a pretty face and A cups over double ds. Big boobed girls are usually fat
    Right on. Down with breast implants.
    callonmeee;31105 said:
    Here's a question for the guys: Are you more attracted to the slimmer girls or the curvier ones? (When I say curvy I don't mean overweight.)
    Slimmer girls all the way. However, they SHOULD NOT be so slim in that I should begin to worry about rather they have Anorexia nervosa or not.
    Triple;31106 said:
    ugh skinny chicks are gross
    flat chest, flat ass, whats the point? might as well date a dude
    Not exactly. The reason I prefer slimmer girls is because I found that they look cuter and prettier than curvier girls.
    nicole;31104 said:
    It is possible to have larger breasts and not be an ogre, you know.
    Really? My impression is that having a larger breasts mean you either have a bombshell look or you are an ogre. Ether way, I dislike large breasts.

    For bombshell, one of the finest example would be American pornographic actress Jenna Jameson.
  • IVTIVT
    edited June 2008
    nicole;31104 said:
    It is possible to have larger breasts and not be an ogre, you know.
    i know. I just get turned off by the Pamela Anderson look, if you know what I mean.
    Student0667;31107 said:

    Not exactly. The reason I prefer slimmer girls is because I found that they look cuter and prettier than curvier girls.
    FINALLY! Somebody gets it! Hallelujah!

    edit: Student, this is a discussion of the T&A, your formal language in this thread is creeping me out.
  • edited June 2008
    IVT;31108 said:
    i know. I just get turned off by the Pamela Anderson look, if you know what I mean.
    Right, how can I forget Pamela Anderson and her freakishly large breasts.
    FINALLY! Somebody gets it! Hallelujah!
    Woot!
    edit: Student, this is a discussion of the T&A, your formal language in this thread is creeping me out.
    Why is that exactly?
  • edited June 2008
    Student0667;31107 said:


    Not exactly. The reason I prefer slimmer girls is because I found that they look cuter and prettier than curvier girls.
    I guess you like the dude look, haha

Leave a Comment