To take part in discussions on talkSFU, please apply for membership (SFU email id required).

Single forever...

24

Comments

  • edited September 2009
    so now you have a bf?
  • edited September 2009
    @bufli: okay fine.. since both you and illicit watched it too.. i'll give ugly truth a try after i finish antichrist (so i can laugh off the horrific images) and see if i can spot your "ugly truth" reply to determine if you really are shallow and a dick.. =P

    @eva: congrats? =)
  • edited September 2009
    siuying;60664 said:
    @bufli: okay fine.. since both you and illicit watched it too.. i'll give ugly truth a try after i finish antichrist (so i can laugh off the horrific images) and see if i can spot your "ugly truth" reply to determine if you really are shallow and a dick.. =P

    @eva: congrats? =)
    You're watching Antichrist? I assume you're talking about the one that's just been released
  • edited September 2009
    yeah.. lars von trier's version.. i've yet to watch the second half of the movie.. where all the bloody parts are (no pun intended)
  • edited September 2009
    siuying;60664 said:
    @bufli: okay fine.. since both you and illicit watched it too.. i'll give ugly truth a try after i finish antichrist (so i can laugh off the horrific images) and see if i can spot your "ugly truth" reply to determine if you really are shallow and a dick.. =P

    @eva: congrats? =)
    im a dick all right not gonna deny that but i dont think im shallow ... just super picky :P
  • edited September 2009
    siuying;60667 said:
    yeah.. lars von trier's version.. i've yet to watch the second half of the movie.. where all the bloody parts are (no pun intended)
    It's coming to the Vancouver Film Festival so I'm probably going to check it out then
  • edited September 2009
    hahaha.. well just to let you know.. 4 ppl fainted while watching it at the cannes film festival.. don't say i didn't warn you.. =P
  • edited September 2009
    Wow, so the OP got a date after all--or maybe was too embarrassed to admit that she is still dateless.


    I was going to reveal the BIGGEST dating turn off, too... for guys and girls.

    I thought the OP might just be simply SOCIALLY AWKWARD. Being socially awkward is usually only cute when someone is stylish and looks like a bomb shell--which the OP admittedly wrote that she is not, and does not.

    Anyhoo, this being university and SFU and all that, I'm sure she found someone just as socially awkward, and now the two are on their way to teaching each other some awesome rites of passage--first kiss, sex, boobs, penises and all that jazz.

    Good on you, Eva.
  • edited September 2009
    thanks siuying for the congrats...
    i got asked out, so no bf yet but it's still way better than before =)

    Lixie, i'm not socially awkward. He's not socially awkward.
    Trust me o.o
  • edited September 2009
    awesome Eva :D!

    btw, how did you meet him? Did he just talk up to you and ask you out, talk casually with you and then ask you out, met in class, etc.
  • edited September 2009
    like they say... chicks have it easy... they just gotta show up :P
  • edited September 2009
    there is still a chance of being flaked though. I saw two attractive asian girls on friday whose date stood her up.
  • edited September 2009
    "like they say... chicks have it easy... they just gotta show up :P"

    girls unless they are attractive don't have it easier. guys can just develop their personality, confidence, social value, etc and there will girls who will be attracted eg the unattractive guy and the hot girls whereas you rarely see it the other way around.

    However, I believe any women can get a guy but it depends on her standards.
  • edited September 2009
    ^ are you kidding me?
    if u honestly believe girls have it harder then guys at getting relationships then you must not get out enough or something... cuz reality couldn't be further from that claim...
  • edited September 2009
    ^ I said that girls can get into a relationship easier than a guy if she has lower standards. i still believe guys would have it easier IF they have the confidence and actually approach girls because by numbers alone, they have a very high chance of getting a relationship. however, quite a few guys are too afraid to approach girls and thus = no relationship. Also, in terms of probability alone, there are a higher percentage of girls wanting relationships compared to guys. For girls, its harder to get a guy to commit to a relationship. A lot of the guys at university would be focusing on solely their school work and thus would not be dating = less competition.
  • edited September 2009
    im gonna have to disagree. guys can focus on school/work but i very much doubt any of them would pass off a girl that they can tell is clearly interested in them (unless shes severely unattractive from their point of view)

    u just said it urself ... unless a chick lowers her standards a guy can have all the confidence in the world but if he lacks in other departments (for example looks) his odds of getting with a girl are slim
  • edited September 2009
    actually... i feel for the guys too.. girls these days can be quite materialistic.. and in most instances.. if a guy doesn't have a car.. isn't good looking.. doesn't have disposable income... you're pretty much out of luck.. and this isn't an exhaustive list by all means as other requirements could be tagged on depending on the girl..

    that's not to say we girls have it easy.. we have our share of problems in relationships too.. just not in this sense.. and i'm against lowering standards unless your standards are way over the top and seriously needs some self-reflection..
  • edited September 2009
    Skip 20secs into it

    [youtube]N16KRNYeRs8[/youtube]
  • edited September 2009
    Haha well let's just say that you should go to the free first sessions of ballroom dancing =P

    I know I could be flaked....and i feel so bad for those girls....so I'm keeping worst-case-scenerios in mind while keeping my chin up =P

    Who has it harder? It really depends on the people, honestly. Everyone is right cuz i know a lot of diff ppl and some fit in one profile while others fit in the other. I do, however, think that guys have the upperhand because they are expected to do the asking out, etc. It doesn't mean they have it harder or easier. Also, girls tend to have stronger feelings more quickly that guys do. It doesn't take that much for a girl to want to ask a guy out. However, guys don't fall so easily and like to have fun so if a guy likes a girl enough to ask her out, it would mean something for the relationship to come.
  • edited September 2009
    EvaWang;60731 said:
    Haha well let's just say that you should go to the free first sessions of ballroom dancing =P

    I know I could be flaked....and i feel so bad for those girls....so I'm keeping worst-case-scenerios in mind while keeping my chin up =P

    Who has it harder? It really depends on the people, honestly. Everyone is right cuz i know a lot of diff ppl and some fit in one profile while others fit in the other. I do, however, think that guys have the upperhand because they are expected to do the asking out, etc. It doesn't mean they have it harder or easier. Also, girls tend to have stronger feelings more quickly that guys do. It doesn't take that much for a girl to want to ask a guy out. However, guys don't fall so easily and like to have fun so if a guy likes a girl enough to ask her out, it would mean something for the relationship to come.
    do u honestly think guys only ask girls out cuz they like them and want a relationship?
    lets be realistic... a lot of guys out there have their own agenda and its nowhere hear happy ending for the girl...lol
  • edited September 2009
    Come over to the Computer Science department! Tons of single guys here who'll gladly explain to you how dynamic optimality for splay trees work! We'll also show you our Star Wars collection!
  • IVTIVT
    edited September 2009
    siuying;60729 said:
    actually... i feel for the guys too.. girls these days can be quite materialistic.. and in most instances.. if a guy doesn't have a car.. isn't good looking.. doesn't have disposable income... you're pretty much out of luck..
    check
    check and check

    fml
  • edited September 2009
    siuying;60729 said:
    actually... i feel for the guys too.. girls these days can be quite materialistic.. and in most instances.. if a guy doesn't have a car.. isn't good looking.. doesn't have disposable income... .
    check..

    ..Check...
    ......CHECK.


    EFF TEE DUBO YUUUUU

    jokes aside, i'd have to say i'd look for the same thing in a girl and most guys would agree on this with me
  • edited September 2009
    may i stress.. THIS ISN'T AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST

    now stop checking yourself off the list.. cause it doesn't automatically make you an eligible bachelor.. =P
  • edited September 2009
    siuying;60737 said:
    may i stress.. THIS ISN'T AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST

    now stop checking yourself off the list.. cause it doesn't automatically make you an eligible bachelor.. =P
    duh ... u left out 12" cock
    :teeth:
  • edited September 2009
    well.. some people aren't biologically gifted that way bufli.. =P
    let's not get into genetic discrimination now..
  • edited September 2009
    siuying;60739 said:
    well.. some people aren't biologically gifted that way bufli.. =P
    let's not get into genetic discrimination now..
    well isn't the quality of being physically attractive genetic discrimination?

    lol
  • edited September 2009
    no.. because different people have different standards to physical attractiveness.. beauty in eyes of the beholder (in its true intent) was not meant to be genetic discriminant..

    wweeellllll... you assigned a measurement to the body part.. and the 12" doesn't leave much room for contesting.. so you either have it or you don't.. even if you're just a cm shy from a twelve incher..:tongue:
  • edited September 2009
    pffffffffffff

    speaking of attractive
    jwarren-Misa_Campo.jpg

    oh that just made this thread a 100 times better lol
  • edited September 2009
    Funny how so many people like to follow the gender presets--no wonder there are a lot of singles on here.

    I'm currently dating a guy who's still getting out of debt, and isn't much of a looker. He owns two cars, that's about all that's going for him.

    There are tons of people out there dating for the company and stimulating conversation instead of money, looks, and social standing. What good is money and looks when you're sitting across a table for two from the guy in absolute awkward silence?

Leave a Comment